Dynamic line rating

  1. Dynamic line rating (DLR) versus static line rating (SLR)
  2. Definitions
  3. Use of DLR in the capacity calculation process
    3.1  Basic principle
    4.1  Applying the capping rule
  4. Current roll-out
  5. Documentation

1. Dynamic line rating (DLR) versus static line rating (SLR)

Static line rating, evaluated with deterministic or probabilistic methods, is based on certain rather conventional assumptions regarding atmospheric operating conditions. This approach has been widely accepted and used for decades, because different direct and indirect measurement techniques were unavailable or only used very rarely.

Over the past decade, one of the potential DLR options has drawn on a number of measurement and forecasting techniques. The data acquisition this entails is very often combined with meteorological measurements. By having both sources of information available, a line conductor model can be calibrated and subsequently used to work out variable transmission line limits, taking account of environmental cooling or heating as a major input factor.

This leads to the following definitions:

Elia has been working with Ampacimon since 2008 to develop and test a technology capable of calculating and forecasting the ampacity of overhead lines based on historical data, weather measurements and forecasts.

Ampacimon's technology uses small modules deployed on the most critical spans of a line. These modules continuously measure line sag, which allows Ampacimon to calculate the maximum permanent flows that the line is capable of supporting. The purpose of DLR is to safely optimise the use of existing line transmission capacity based on the real conditions under which power lines operate.

 

2. Definitions

Ampacimon's Horizon licence provides different types of data:

  1. Real-time (RT) ampacity: This is the permanent maximum ampacity of the line equipped with Ampacimon's modules (under unchanging weather conditions), with data updates every 5 minutes. This results in higher, but extremely volatile, Imax values, which makes these values less useful for the operational process.
  2. 1-hour forecast: This forecasts the maximum ampacity of the line equipped with Ampacimon modules for the next hour, with data updates every 5 minutes. The given Imax values are more stable than the RT ampacity and are therefore used to manage the transmission system in real time.
  3. Forecast Horizon: This forecasts the maximum ampacity of the line equipped with Ampacimon modules for the next two days, with data updates every 6 hours. These values are primarily based on temperature forecasts. Again, the given Imax values are more stable than the RT ampacity and can therefore be used in capacity calculation methods.

3. Use of DLR in the capacity calculation process

Using DLR in the process for calculating day-ahead and Intraday capacity means that, given the ambient temperature, wind speed and wind direction relating to a transmission line, the Imax of that line is dynamically determined based on DLR data that take account of these weather conditions within the limits of safe grid operation. The static seasonal limits are taken as the lower limit, so that applying DLR only has an increasing effect.

3.1 Basic principle

The basic principle for applying DLR to calculations of line capacity entails maximising the average capacity increase within the limits of a pre-defined increase in the risk to grid safety.

In an ideal scenario, a new method can be introduced without altering the risk to the grid's safe operation. However, since this is unrealistic, an acceptable increase in risk must be taken into account.

Using DLR increases the risk because the 1-hour forecast for every hour is not higher than the Forecast Horizon used to calculate capacity*. Consequently, the values from the Forecast Horizon cannot simply be carried over into the capacity calculation process, but have to be 'pre-treated'.

The method that, on average, results in the greatest increase (for the same risk increase) is a capping rule. Such a rule limits the value generated by the Forecast Horizon to a certain percentage related to seasonal limits.

(*) The increase in risk can be calculated as the percentage by which the Forecast Horizon exceeds the 1-hour forecast.

The pre-defined acceptable increase in risk is currently set at 0.1%, corresponding to roughly 9 hours a year.

3.2 Applying the capping rule

Ampacimon's data indicate that the increase in the line's ampacity is systematically higher at night than during the day. This makes it possible to apply the capping rule, applying a different cap for peak and off-peak hours.

The height of this cap is determined based on the acceptable operational risk. The relationship between the height of the cap and the operational risk can be represented by calculating the weighted average of the operational risk for all lines equipped with a Forecast Horizon module, and doing this for each capping level within the applicable scope. The cap to apply can then be determined based on the pre-defined acceptable increase in operational risk (0.1%)*. The Forecast Horizon values for day-ahead and intraday calculation methods in D2CF, DACF and IDCF files are limited to x% for peak hours and y% for off-peak hours. For 2018, these values have been set at:

These x and y values will be re-set every year and published in line with the commitment to transparency set out on the Elia website and also in an Urgent Market Message.

(*) See also section 4.3.1. "Peak vs. Off-peak" in the explanatory note.

4. Current roll-out

The table below shows the different Ampacimon modules and forecasting licences used by Elia.

Line ID

Line Name

1-hour forecast licence

Horizon licence

380.23

Meerhout-Van Eyck

YES

-

380.27

Van Eyck-Maasbracht

YES

-

380.19

Achène-Lony

YES

YES

380.25

Doel-Zandvliet

YES

YES

380.11

Lixhe-Gramme

YES

-

380.91

Van Eyck-Lixhe

YES

YES

380.12

Van Eyck-Gramme

YES

YES

380.28

Van Eyck-Maasbracht

YES

YES

380.79

Avelgem-Mastaing

YES

YES

380.29

Zandvliet-Kreekrak

YES

-

380.30

Zandvliet-Kreekrak

YES

-

380.31

Gramme-Courcelles

YES

YES

380.80

Avelgem-Avelin

YES

YES

380.26

Doel-Zandvliet

YES

YES

380.73

Mercator-Horta

YES

YES

380.74

Mercator-Horta

YES

YES

380.101

Horta-Avelgem

YES

YES

380.102

Horta-Avelgem

YES

YES

220.513

Aubange-Moulaine

YES

YES

220.514

Aubange-Moulaine

YES

YES

150.5

Brugge-Langerbrugge

YES

-

150.6

Brugge-Langerbrugge

YES

-

150.7

Langerbrugge - Nieuwevaart

YES

-

150.8

Langerbrugge - Nieuwevaart

YES

-

150.15

Brugge-Slykens

YES

-

150.16

Brugge-Slykens

YES

-

150.313

Baudour-Chièvres

YES

-

150.314

Baudour-Chièvres

YES

-

70.49

Moucron-Tournai

YES

-

5. Documentation